Rochus against Herman tit for tat
Herman:
I understand, or maybe not. Why are you distant to answer my question?, instead you are
answering with a contra question. I am seaking, while you are demanding, which contradicts
your underlying philosophy of general sharing, togetherness, and freedom.
Rochus:
Exactly, this is why I have to be careful not to appear as a ruler. Honestly, I don't know
how to come across with facts that may be of sensitive nature in this early stages of this
tragic on one side, but subsequently secure, pleasent, fair, and of a natural polymorphic
existence that shares the center, on a different side.
Let me say this, with far removed preconceptions.
I am not the genius behind this technical abilities, which are by the way physiological.
There are many pockets filled with high technological abilities in our world today.
Without appearing threatening, or demanding attention, consider the following.
Unlike dust to dust, the people alongside of me have the technical ability to return
anything back to the common energy pool. We did not rise from dust. Everything that exists
in the cosmos, are products of cohesive energy that is related to cohere, attract,
multiply, with a dogged persistence to solidify in this and that codification to
carnify and grow.
The group of freedom fighters are organised by the word itself, They are spearheaded to
demolish anything that wants to remember the comforting "usual",
whereby the Domesticated Spartans are positioned and ready to fight for
"absolute truth and absolute freedom".
We are just very lucky to have two scientists with brains that refuse the floor below
their feet, and any roof above their heads.
As we speak,
we both can vanish becoming part of the cosmic energy pool,
because our scientists are served by a handmade conscious artificial intelligence that
can sense globally DNA intent proclamation that produces special proteins for a human brain,
on the basis of retrofit energy flux, if I can put it plainly.
With other words, even if you know to our groups whereabouts, and intent to harm us,
you will be removed.
Herman:
Wahoo,
You made it clear for me to understand, that my brain function can trigger my elimination.
Rochus:
So to say, Yes!
But don't worry because you are still here.
Herman:
But this is a form of fascism?, isn't it?
Rochus:
Yes!, ~ ~ it is.
But,
Not for long.
Once the general global energy flux responsible for human thought has reached the desired
equilibrium, the present technology will become mainstream.
One of the biggest dangers of human interaction and freedom was the criminal behaviour sparked
and maintained flammable, and explosive like gas, because of the global financial, media,
and clergy fascism, controlled by governments that where placed and looked after to serve the
interests of a destructive, slow, backward, comfortable social circles that propagated through
ancestry, existing on higher social grounds.
This imprisonment of energetic minds has now stopped.
All prisoners are free.
All of them.
Justice has returned where it should always be, NOWHERE.
Because there is o justice.
Uneducated, and socially forced stupid behaviour is now played out and resolved like it has
always been in the past, before clergy become institutionalized, on the street, and open air.
Herman:
But law and order is regulative?
Rochus:
Precisely,
Regulative by definition means :: Restricting according to rules or principles.
Restricting?,
which rules?,
and which principles?.
This is a very fuzzy line, but maybe clearer for someone who stands still, or want it his way.
The entire law structure is setup with mathematical principles of scattered interference on
sets of guidelines to keep the polynomic breakouts manageable.
Herman:
If someone does harm to a person, or to a persons property, justice must be served, no?
Rochus:
This is very difficult to answer, like that.
There is lots of analysis behind any case of conflict, to make clear the reasons responsible
for such behaviours.
My early years of law study got me very closed to analysing various single matters with many
contributive factors. Not to my surprise, money, status, compilation arguments that spring
from money-status, support, and approve or sanction upon most cases, to 95% making clear
the very strong interdependence of money and social status.
So,
If you take out money - status - inconclusiveness, you have no case.
Just a few days ago a big drama was comming to my ears from my intelligence circle.
A person wanting to fly to hawaii for a relaxation period was refused to do so, until numerous
people interven reminding the aeroplane seat allocation service provider that any person has
his choice to be the rule.
If this person doesn't like that, he or she can go and contribute something else,
or nothing at all, which brings us to another critical factor of the contribution relavance
that will shape this new world.
Herman:
I can see that, but there are people that will do anything to be above other people.
There are very symmetrical pretty, beautiful humans out there that have a natural advantage
over others.
This creatures are marked as different, they are conspicuous or noteworthy, at least.
Rochus:
Yes they are, and there are also very large, small, heavy, healthy, sick people.
There are very religious minds out there, convinced that hiding the natural beauty by
dressing alike is the way.
The moment has come to look over and beyond this differentiations, and realize that looks
is important to feathery creatures like Peacock, or the great Egret.
We humans must take the step out of this visual nefariousness to appreciate natures greatest
achievement, "intelligence".